Mental Health Tribunal: Apply to Review a s.3 Detention

By the eLitigant Editorial Team · Reviewed for current forms, fees & procedure · How we check our guides

Free to start · no sign-up · no card. Tell Chris what has happened and see whether we can help before you pay anything. One matter · one case folder · a full day of drafting. If the drafts are not up to the standard you expected, email us within 7 days of paying for a full refund. If money is tight, Help with Fees can remove the court fee entirely, and Citizens Advice is free — we will always tell you when you do not need us.

Quick answer: If you (or your nearest relative) are detained under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983, you can apply to the First-tier Tribunal (Mental Health) to review the detention and seek discharge. The tribunal must discharge you if the legal grounds for detention are no longer met. There are strict time limits to apply, and you are entitled to free, non-means-tested legal representation.

Detention under the Mental Health Act is one of the gravest powers the state exercises. The Tribunal that reviews detention is one of the most accessible — patients have automatic rights of review and legal aid is non-means-tested. Family members supporting a loved one can draft alongside the panel solicitor.

The main sections

Section 2 — assessment (up to 28 days)
Section 3 — treatment (up to 6 months, renewable)
Section 17A — Community Treatment Order
Section 37 — hospital order on conviction
Section 41 — hospital order with restrictions

Tribunal rights

Section 2: one application within first 14 days, heard within 7 days
Section 3: one application per period of detention, additional applications on renewal
Nearest Relative can also apply
Hospital Managers also have review rights (separate)

The test on discharge

For civil sections (s.2, s.3), the Tribunal must discharge unless satisfied:

Patient is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree warranting detention
Detention is necessary for health, safety, or protection of others
For s.3 — appropriate treatment is available

The burden is on the detaining authority. A poorly evidenced detention can be defeated at Tribunal.

Let Chris draft this for you

Upload the decision, medical evidence, reports, correspondence. Chris drafts with statutory citations and the dignity the subject deserves — to the standard the Tribunal or Adjudicator expects.

Evidence at Tribunal

Responsible Clinician’s report
Nursing report
Social circumstances report (by AMHP)
Medical records
Patient’s own account
Nearest Relative’s account
Independent psychiatric opinion (where obtained)

Key areas to challenge

Nature / degree — current symptoms versus historical diagnosis
Necessity — less restrictive alternatives considered? (Article 8 proportionality)
Treatment availability (s.3) — is appropriate treatment actually being delivered?
Discharge plan — robust community support, crisis plan, accommodation

The hearing

Panel: Judge + medical member + specialist lay member. Informal. Patient attends if wishes. Family present typically. Decision usually same day or within 3 days.

What Chris drafts (complementing the panel solicitor)

Nearest Relative statements for Tribunal
Family statements supporting discharge plan
Preparation notes for panel solicitor from family perspective
Challenge to specific medical findings where family disagree
Post-Tribunal complaints if the hearing process was flawed
Hospital Managers’ review applications (separate from Tribunal)

Chris works alongside legal aid representation — never replaces it for regulated advocacy.

Can Chris help?

Yes, in the family support role. Upload section papers, medical reports, care plan, family chronology. Chris drafts family witness statements and a discharge plan proposal that the patient’s solicitor can adopt.

Prepare to win. Plan not to fail.

Mental Health Tribunals are the most dignified forums in the justice system. Chris drafts with the dignity the patient deserves.

Handled with the utmost care and sensitivity

These are difficult, personal matters. We do not publish a worked example out of respect. Instead, here is the blank official form Chris helps you complete — gently, accurately and to a professional standard, from your own words.

BLANK FORM · Chris completes it with you

APPLICATION TO THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (MENTAL HEALTH)

Patient’s name

Hospital and ward

Section detained under (e.g. s.3 MHA 1983)

Responsible clinician

Why discharge is sought (grounds)

Representative / solicitor (if any)

Signature and date

Blank illustrative layout. Chris drafts yours privately from your own facts, with the utmost care and sensitivity; you check, sign and submit.

How Chris helps

Chris approaches these matters with the utmost care and sensitivity. We help you set out the grounds for discharge clearly and respectfully, in your own words, to a professional standard — privately, and at your pace.

Draft my document →

Official source: GOV.UK — Mental Health Tribunal

Last reviewed: June 2026 · England & Wales · CIC No. 16566612 — not a law firm.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Would you rather we drafted it for you?

Tell us what has happened and what you need. Every document is quoted case by case, on its size and the time it needs, and the price is agreed with you by email before any work starts. Nothing is charged until you say go.

Once agreed, it comes back to you within one working day (business documents usually within the hour). You read it, check every date and figure, sign it and file it: it stays your document throughout. No need to attach anything now — once we reply, you send your papers by email.

We use your details only to reply to this enquiry. eLitigant CIC is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. You remain the author of your documents.