Quick answer
To appeal a First-tier Tribunal decision to the Upper Tribunal you must show an arguable error of law, not simply disagree with the outcome. First seek permission from the First-tier Tribunal; if refused, apply to the Upper Tribunal. Grounds and any deadlines depend on the chamber, so check the decision notice for the exact time limit.
Last reviewed: June 2026 · For use in England & Wales · eLitigant is a Community Interest Company (No. 16566612), not a law firm. Always check the current official form on GOV.UK before you file, and sign the statement of truth yourself.
Please note: this page is an information guide only. eLitigant does not draft immigration or asylum applications and does not provide immigration advice — by law, immigration advice and services may only be provided by a regulated adviser. For help with an immigration or asylum matter, please use a solicitor or an adviser regulated by the Immigration Advice Authority.
The Upper Tribunal hears appeals from the First-tier Tribunal on errors of law. Benefits cases, immigration appeals, tax decisions, land tribunal rulings — all channel through the UT before reaching the Court of Appeal. Drafting discipline at this level is even more important than at first instance.
The respect creed — before any appeal.
The Judge is always right — even when you may think otherwise. Do not attack the bench. Do not allege bias without clear evidence. Respect the decision. Identify the error of law or the error of fact the appeal court can consider. File the grounds within the deadline. Walk on. The appellate court never “corrects” a lower court — it “considers afresh.” That is the tone your grounds should take.
The four chambers
- Administrative Appeals Chamber — SSCS benefits appeals, mental health, care standards, social entitlement
- Immigration and Asylum Chamber (UTIAC) — immigration and asylum appeals
- Tax and Chancery Chamber — tax, charity, financial services decisions
- Lands Chamber — land valuation, compulsory purchase, housing
Error of law — what counts
- Misstatement of the applicable statute
- Misapplication of binding authority
- Failure to give adequate reasons
- Procedural unfairness
- Perverse finding of fact (Wednesbury unreasonableness)
- Failure to consider material evidence
- Consideration of irrelevant material
The two-stage permission process
- Apply to First-tier Tribunal judge who made the decision for permission — attached to FtT decision
- If refused, apply to Upper Tribunal directly — fresh application
- UT refuses permission on the papers → oral renewal may be available
- UT grants permission → substantive appeal listed
Structure of grounds — the Litigant Standard
Each ground:
- Quote the FtT finding challenged (paragraph number)
- State the legal error with authority
- Show materiality — would the outcome have differed?
Upper Tribunal judges routinely cite the need for “clarity and focus” in grounds. Vague grounds get refused.
The reasons challenge
Inadequate reasons is a common error-of-law ground. FtT must give reasons sufficient for the parties to understand why they won or lost. “Adequate” reasons — not exhaustive. Check whether the reasons failed to address a material issue.
Set aside, re-make, or remit
If the UT finds error of law:
- Set aside the FtT decision
- Re-make the decision itself (if sufficient findings of fact)
- Remit to a fresh FtT (often where further fact-finding needed)
Onward appeals
From UT to Court of Appeal — permission required, “important point of principle or practice” or other compelling reason (second-tier appeal test). Higher bar.
What goes into a UT appeal pack?
A well-prepared Upper Tribunal appeal pack typically covers:
- Application for permission to FtT
- Application for permission to UT if refused below
- Grounds of appeal — error of law, authority-anchored
- Skeleton argument for permission
- Skeleton argument for substantive appeal
Prepare to win. Plan not to fail.
The FtT Judge ruled. Respect the ruling. Identify the error of law. Walk on to the UT with precision.
Frequently asked questions
What does the Upper Tribunal decide?
The Upper Tribunal hears appeals from the First-tier Tribunal on errors of law. Benefits cases, immigration and asylum appeals, tax decisions and land tribunal rulings all channel through the Upper Tribunal before reaching the Court of Appeal.
What counts as an error of law?
Recognised grounds include misstating the applicable statute, misapplying binding authority, failing to give adequate reasons, procedural unfairness, a perverse finding of fact (Wednesbury unreasonableness), failing to consider material evidence, or considering irrelevant material.
How does the permission process work?
It is a two-stage process. You first apply to the First-tier Tribunal judge who made the decision for permission. If refused, you apply to the Upper Tribunal directly as a fresh application. If the Upper Tribunal refuses permission on the papers, an oral renewal may be available; if it grants permission, the substantive appeal is listed.
How should grounds of appeal be structured?
Each ground should quote the First-tier Tribunal finding challenged by paragraph number, state the legal error with authority, and show materiality — whether the outcome would have differed. Upper Tribunal judges routinely require clarity and focus; vague grounds get refused.
What can the Upper Tribunal do if it finds an error of law?
It can set aside the First-tier Tribunal decision and then re-make the decision itself where there are sufficient findings of fact, or remit the matter to a fresh First-tier Tribunal where further fact-finding is needed.
Can I appeal onwards to the Court of Appeal?
An onward appeal from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Appeal requires permission and must meet the second-tier appeal test — an important point of principle or practice, or some other compelling reason. This is a higher bar.
Related guides: Form N161 — Civil Appeal Appellant’s Notice · Family Court Appeal Guide · All civil court forms