"Chris helped me draft the perfected grounds for appeal and the skeleton argument. All were submitted."
— Regine from Wembley
An appeal is not a re-run of the trial. It is a targeted challenge to a specific error the lower court made — an error of law, a procedural irregularity, or a finding of fact that no reasonable judge could have made on the evidence. Drafted with that discipline, an appeal can succeed. Drafted as a general complaint, it will not.
The respect creed — before any appeal.
The Judge is always right — even when you may think otherwise. Do not attack the bench. Do not allege bias without clear evidence. Respect the decision. Identify the error of law or the error of fact the appeal court can consider. File the grounds within the deadline. Walk on. The appellate court never “corrects” a lower court — it “considers afresh.” That is the tone Chris drafts in.
When an appeal lies
- Error of law (wrong statute applied, law misstated, precedent ignored)
- Procedural irregularity causing injustice
- Finding of fact no reasonable judge could have made
- Decision outside the proper ambit of discretion
- Refusal to consider relevant evidence or consideration of irrelevant evidence
What an appeal is NOT
Need help with your court documents?
Chris can draft statements of case, witness statements, and application notices — written to the standard the court expects.
Consult with Chris28-Day Money-Back Guarantee
- A chance to re-argue the same points
- A forum for dissatisfaction with findings
- A place to raise new evidence (strict test for admission)
- A way to attack the integrity of the first instance judge
The 21-day clock
Strict. Extension applications require:
- Good reason for delay
- Merit in the appeal
- No prejudice to other party caused by delay
Structure of grounds of appeal — the Litigant Standard
Each ground:
- Identify the specific finding or ruling challenged
- State the legal error (with authority)
- Explain why the error was material — if corrected, would the outcome have been different?
Example: “Ground 1: The learned District Judge erred in law in finding that the contract was governed by English law. The conflict of laws analysis at paragraph [X] of the judgment misstated the position under the Rome I Regulation Article 4. The correct analysis identifies [governing law]. The error was material because the applicable law determined the limitation period relied upon by the Defendant.”
Let Chris draft the appeal
Upload the judgment or decision, the bundle used at first instance, and the transcript if available. Chris identifies the error of law or error of fact, drafts grounds that show the appellate court a genuine question to consider, and drafts the skeleton argument. Hybrid £1,000 for appeals where qualified reviewer sign-off makes a material difference.
The skeleton argument
Required at permission stage typically. Concise. Each ground developed with authorities. Page limits apply. Chris drafts within limits.
Fresh evidence on appeal — the Ladd v Marshall test
Admission of fresh evidence requires:
- Could not with reasonable diligence have been obtained for trial
- Would probably have had important influence on result
- Apparently credible
Permission to appeal
Permission is the gate. Paper application typically. Oral hearing may be requested where permission refused on paper. CPR 52.6 test.
Appeal hearings
Generally on paper and bundles — oral argument only on specified points. Skeleton argument is the main vehicle. Cross-examination of witnesses rare.
Costs consequences
Loser pays at first instance often applies at appeal. Where permission refused and appeal deemed unarguable, costs can follow. Chris drafts appeals with realistic merit assessment.
Can Chris draft the appeal pack?
Yes. Upload the judgment/order, trial bundle if needed, your notes. Chris drafts:
- N161 Appellant’s Notice
- Grounds of appeal — precise, numbered, authority-anchored
- Skeleton argument
- Draft order sought
- Fresh evidence application if applicable
Hybrid £1,000 — appeals are where reviewer sign-off adds meaningful protection against misstatement of law.
Prepare to win. Plan not to fail.
Respect the decision. Appeal with precision. Walk on with the dignity the court expects.
Appeals drafted with the dignity the bench expects.
Chris drafts grounds of appeal that identify the legal error with precision — no inflammatory language, no attacks on judicial integrity. The appellate bench reads many grounds. Chris drafts the kind they take seriously.
Buy Chris Some Chips 🍟 · £30 one-off · Pro £88 · Hybrid £1,000
🛡️ 7-day money-back guarantee · Email hello@elitigant.com
Ready to Prepare Your Case?
Chris drafts court-ready documents to the standard judges expect. 100 consultations. 28 days. Step by step.
Start My Case — £30✓ 28-Day Money-Back Guarantee · Court documents within the hour
If you found this article helpful for your case then please leave us a tip — we are a community-based business funded by your readership.
Tip for Chris — £5